Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval

The Lancet

21 March 2020 - Fewer than half of new drugs have data on their comparative benefits and harms against existing treatment options at the time of regulatory approval in Europe and the USA. 

Even when active-comparator trials exist, they might not produce meaningful data to inform decisions in clinical practice and health policy. 

The uncertainty associated with the paucity of well designed active-comparator trials has been compounded by legal and regulatory changes in Europe and the USA that have created a complex mix of expedited programmes aimed at facilitating faster access to new drugs.

Read The Lancet article

Michael Wonder

Posted by:

Michael Wonder