Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries

European Journal of Health Economics

23 January 2018 - Although health technology assessment systems base their decision making process either on economic evaluations or comparative clinical benefit assessment, a central aim of recent approaches to value measurement, including value based assessment and pricing, points towards the incorporation of supplementary evidence and criteria that capture additional dimensions of value.

Angelis set out to study the practices, processes and policies of value-assessment for new medicines across eight European countries and the role of health technology assessment beyond economic evaluation and clinical benefit assessment.

All countries assess similar types of evidence; however, the specific criteria/endpoints used, their level of provision and requirement, and the way they are incorporated (e.g. explicitly vs. implicitly) varies across countries, with their relative importance remaining generally unknown. Incorporation of additional ‘social value judgements’ (beyond clinical benefit assessment) and economic evaluation could help explain heterogeneity in coverage recommendations and decision-making.

Read European Journal of Health Economics article

Michael Wonder

Posted by:

Michael Wonder